Provocation Policy of the British Deep
State
When the
British deep state decided to dismember the Ottoman Empire, its first step was
inciting regional riots. Its spies and minions as mentioned in the previous
chapter played important roles in these riots. One shouldn't think that
minorities living under Ottoman rule actually participated in these risings. On
the contrary, those riots were organized by hypocrites and sycophants in
various ethnical groups who chose to betray their country for petty personal
gains.
By the end
of the 19th century, the British deep state managed to tear Serbia,
Bosnia Herzegovina, Romania, Bulgaria, and Montenegro from the Ottoman Empire,
and then Macedonia, Salonica (modern Thessaloniki) and Manastır (modern Bitola)
in the early 20th century. The same 'minority' provocation was once again
active, the same provocative British spies were once again on the scene, and
nations that had harmoniously co-existed for 600 years under Ottoman rule were
presented as people opposed to the Ottoman Empire. By means of their spies and
mercenaries, they created civil unrest and riots in these regions. During this
time, close to 5 million Balkan Muslims were martyred, while another 5 million
were forced to flee to Anatolia. The British deep state carried out a
wide-scaled massacre.
Greece,
Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro and Romania, which declared independence with the
help of the British deep state, couldn't escape becoming puppets. Despite
having lived in peace for centuries in the Ottoman Empire, these nations, on
behalf of the British deep state, attacked the Ottoman Empire in the Balkan
Wars. Similarly, Greece occupied Anatolia prior to the War of Independence.
The riots
that had the most deadly effect on the Empire were the Arab riots. Directly
instigated by British spy Lawrence, these riots achieved their goal due to the
support of anglophile sycophants.
Armenian
riots, another factor that contributed to the fall of the Empire, will be
examined in further detail in the next part of the book.
British
deep state policy is based on pitting nations against nations. Within a matter
of one hundred years, Balkan nations fought the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians
fought the Turks, the Kurds fought the Armenians, the Arabs fought each other
and the Turks, the Caucasians fought each other and the Armenians. The British
units that attacked the Ottoman Empire consisted of provoked colonized nations.
During this process, the British deep state never directly took part, instead used
its spies, propaganda tools and the media outlets and provoked poor people.
While
Darwinism and moral corruption were eroding the moral values of the Ottoman
society, debts were crippling its economy and the hypocrites were working on
destroying the patriotic consciousness. This loss took a disastrous toll not
only on the Ottoman Empire, but on the nations mentioned as well. From that
point on, these regions were ensnared by the British deep state and were turned
into pawns, and civil unrest still continues.
The Greek Uprising and Lord Byron
During the
Greek uprising, the Ottoman army fought not only the Greek troops, but the
British deep state, too. Strangely enough, British homosexual poet Lord Byron
fought alongside the Greeks, almost more enthusiastically than they did. He
even set up a mercenary unit called the 'Byron Brigade', and died heading it.
He also persuaded Ali Pasha of Ioannina, with whom he had a homosexual
relationship, to start an insurgency against the Ottoman Empire, forcing the Ottoman
army to fight on two fronts at the same time.
The
Ottoman army was about to suppress the Greek insurgency, but under the
leadership of the British deep state, the British, French and Russian navies
attacked the Ottoman navy in Navarino and sank more than 70 vessels of the
Ottoman and Egyptian fleets. (The British deep state's role in the Navarino
attack will be explained further in the following pages.) However, even the
destruction of the Ottoman and Egyptian fleets wasn't enough to secure a Greek victory.
The Greek state couldn't be established until after the Russo-Turkish War
(1828-29). All these developments took place through careful manipulation by
and under the watchful eyes of the British deep state. In the end, the Greeks
gained independence through the help of the deep state.
Greek
commander Kolokotronis wrote in his memoir how they martyred 32,000 Turks in
the city of Tripolitsa. British historian Walter Alison Phillip said the
following about the massacre:
For
three days the miserable [Turkish] inhabitants were given over to lust and
cruelty of a mob of savages. Neither sex nor age was spared. Women and children
were tortured before being put to death. So great was the slaughter that [Greek
guerilla leader] Kolokotronis himself says that, from the gate to the citadel
his horse's hoofs never touched the ground. His path of triumph was carpeted
with corpses. At the end of two days, the wretched remnant of the Mussulmans
were deliberately collected, to the number of some two thousand souls, of every
age and sex, but principally women and children, were led out to a ravine in
the neighboring mountains and there butchered like cattle.157
William St. Clair wrote the eyewitness accounts and descriptions of the officers present during the massacre:
Upwards
of ten thousand Turks were put to death. Prisoners who were suspected of having
concealed their money were tortured. Their arms and legs were cut off and they
were slowly roasted over fires. Pregnant women were cut open, their heads cut
off, and dogs' heads stuck between their legs. From Friday to Sunday the air
was filled with the sound of screams... One Greek boasted that he personally
killed ninety people. The Jewish colony was systematically tortured... For
weeks afterwards starving Turkish children running helplessly about the ruins
were being cut down and shot at by exultant Greeks... The wells were poisoned
by the bodies that had been thrown in.158
The Greek
insurgency that the British deep state instigated to further her own interests
didn't benefit the Greeks, either. After an independent Greek state was
founded, a reverse migration – one from Greece to the Ottoman territories –
began and 60,000 people left Greece between 1834-36, and many chose the Island
of Crete, which was then ruled by the Khedive of Egypt, Mehmed Ali Pasha (aka
Muhammad Ali of Egypt).
The main
motive behind the Greek uprising was driving Turks out of Europe. Indeed, the
project that started with these riots continued for another 100 years until it
completely put an end to the 500-year Turkish presence in the Balkans. As a
result, the Muslim population declined significantly. American historian Justin
McCarthy estimates that between 1821 and 1922, close to 5.5 million Muslims
were driven out of Europe and another 5 million were martyred directly or
indirectly as a result of diseases or hunger while fleeing.
Bulgarian Uprising
The
British Prime Minister of the time, William Ewart Gladstone, based his
full-fledged smear campaign against the Ottoman Empire and the Turks on the
developments that took place in what is now modern Bulgaria. Together with The
Times, he organized wide-scale anti-Turkish campaigns across London for
days, while his book Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East,
printed in 200,000 copies, offered grossly overstated accounts of incidents
intended to fuel Turkophobia. In truth, he was only using the Bulgarian riots,
which had been instigated by the British deep state in the first place, to
support the black propaganda campaign he was going to launch against the
Ottoman Empire.
The
Bulgarian uprising was only one in a series of insurgencies started with the
provocation of the British deep state as the Ottoman Empire entered its era of
decline. Strangely, after centuries of peaceful co-existence on Ottoman lands,
minority groups suddenly began to turn against the Empire. However, a closer
look reveals the origin of these riots and sedition to be the spies, soldiers,
officers, and ambassadors of the British deep state. Rebels in these minorities
were personally armed by the British deep state, encouraged to adopt an
anti-Turkish sentiment and rise against the Empire. The uprisings started with
horrible incidents where hundreds, and in some cases, thousands, of Muslim
Turks were martyred. When the Ottoman army offered the necessary response, the
provocateurs of the British deep state started smear campaigns along with
shouts of 'murderous, genocidal Turks'. This was the main method of the British
deep state when it wished to incite riots and conflicts within the Ottoman
Empire.
Historian
author Süleyman Kocabaş wrote about the British deep state's sedition aimed at
causing a Bulgarian insurgency:
Britain repeated its actions at Greek
insurgency to incite Bulgarian riots. Britain, which in the past had opposed
Slav uprisings to maintain Ottoman's territorial integrity, started to defend
Bulgarians in 1870s for the so-called purpose of saving them from the Russian
influence. It allowed [Panslavists] to set up committees in London, allowed
these groups to provoke gang attacks against Turks and objected to Turks'
prohibition of those violent gangs.159
These
British-deep-state-backed riots brought Ottoman communities, which had
co-existed in peace for centuries, into conflict with each other.
Unsurprisingly, the ensuing political circumstances served only the British
deep state interests. Once again for its sake, millions of Muslims, Christians,
Jews, Turks, Bulgarians, Armenians, Greeks, Bosnians, Arabs, Circassians and Albanian
civilians - women, children or elderly - were slaughtered indiscriminately.
The
Bulgarian casualty during the uprising was 1,400 according to official Ottoman
reports. Some 1,000 Muslim Ottoman citizens were slaughtered during the same
time. However, the European media was quick to inflate the deaths, citing it as
high as 200,000. However, today even the Bulgarian authorities' claim is
30,000. The reports prepared by neutral Belgium authorities on the other hand,
put the number at 4,500. Needless to say, civilians lost their lives and this
is far more important than any debate over numbers. The important point is that
the British deep state once again caused the loss of innocent lives. Having
said that, the surprising gap in numbers is another sign of British deep
state's involvement. It is a known fact that the British deep state usually
overinflates numbers when its wishes to create an uproar.
One of the
main reasons behind the Bulgarian uprising was the desire to set the stage for
the coup of 1876 that marked the beginning of the end for the Empire. Only one
and one-half months after the Bulgarian uprising, a pro-British group staged a
coup, martyred Sultan Abdülaziz Khan, declared Murat V insane, and brought
Abdul Hamid II to the throne by force. All these developments took place in
line with the British deep state plans. Subsequently, the British deep state
put pressure on Abdul Hamid II and convinced him to act in line with its
demands. Interestingly, the anti-Turkish remarks of the British Prime Minister
Gladstone suddenly stopped after Abdul Hamid II ascended to the throne.
The April
Uprising has been the main factor behind the incidents that culminated in the
coup. From April 20, 1876, when the uprising started, right until August 31,
when Abdul Hamid II was made the Sultan, the British deep state unleashed a
relentless campaign of hatred on Turks. Mysteriously, many circles that accused
Turks of carrying out non-existent massacres at the time kept strangely quiet
in the face of very real British deep state massacres in Africa (Zulus),
Australia (Aborigines), the US (Indians), and the Far East (Indians and
Chinese), despite the clear evidence.
Yemen Uprising
The first
serious military confrontation between Britain and the Ottoman Empire took place
when the British deep state bought a few greedy sheikhs in order to gain a
foothold in the city of Aden, Yemen, an important and valuable Ottoman
province. Seeking to further solidify its presence, the British deep state
began to search for a reliable fortress in northeast Yemen. Historian Süleyman
Kocabaş describes the furtive steps that led to the invasion of Yemen:
After
Britain entered Aden, it continued to advance in the northeast direction and
resorted to all imaginable methods to achieve its goal of seizing the fertile
lands ahead. They wore Arab clothes, spoke Arabic, deceived Arabs with promises
of independence; all for the sake of interests of their island.160
This was
the reason behind the notorious Yemen uprisings that took place while it was
under Ottoman rule. The Empire dispatched corps and even small armies to
suppress the riots, but despite suffering massive casualties, it lost Yemen.
Once again, a few sheikhs, who viewed their personal interests over those of
their country, preferred to be pawns of the British deep state. Their horrible
betrayal caused the martyrdom of thousands of people.
Developments in North Africa
In the 16th
century, the Ottoman Empire – a strong naval force – conquered North Africa.
The Empire reached the coast of Italy in the north, controlled the entire
Eastern Mediterranean and seized Egypt and Morocco in the south. In other
words, the Mediterranean became a Turkish lake. The colonial powers of France,
Spain, Britain and Holland had to pass the Atlantic Ocean to reach South and
West Africa.
Once again,
Britain wasn't ready to accept the situation. To the leaders of the British
deep state, the lands that had to be under British control were controlled by a
Muslim empire. Due to their deep-seated hostility towards Islam and the Turks,
this wasn't something they could accept. As a result, over the course of the 18th
century, the British deep state severed Muslim lands in Africa from the Ottoman
Empire, one by one, and it used usual tactics and provocation methods in the
process.
Morocco
The
relations of the British deep state with Morocco started in the 16th century.
Just as with the Ottoman Empire, Queen Elizabeth I of England managed to get
trading privileges from the Moroccan Emperor and started trade in the region on
behalf of England. The English Barbary Company, with the charter granted by the
Queen, purchased a part of the annual Moroccan sugar produce in exchange for
English weapon and cloth. It must be remembered that the Turkey Company
operated in a similar fashion and conducted business with the Ottomans for 300
years as a privileged monopoly.
In the
early 20th century, the British deep state covertly instigated two
incidents in Morocco, in 1906 and 1911, known as the Moroccan Crises. Using the
power struggle in the country as a pretense, France deployed its troops to the
country. Germany didn't want to be left out and sent its navy to the region. As
a result, Germany and the British-France alliance came close to war twice.
These two crises are usually seen as substantial contributing factors to WWI.
The truth
is, all of those were 'planned' developments. This way, Britain was able to
make France more dependent on her and managed to turn British public against
Germany. All these developments sped up the start of WWI, which had been
planned and orchestrated by the British deep state. Furthermore, as the rivals
of Britain were spending time in Morocco, Britain was busy taking Egypt under
its control. In the end, thousands of Moroccan Muslims that were martyred in
the crises had to pay the price of this power game of the British deep state.
It was
crucial for Britain that Morocco was under the control of one of her allies,
because it allowed the British deep state to control one side of the Gibraltar
Strait, the gate to Mediterranean.
British-supported Conflicts in Western
Sahara
Morocco has
been at war with the separatist Polisario Front in Western Sahara for the last
thirty years. Britain, on the other hand, has been covertly supplying weapons
to both sides in the conflict. In Western Sahara, where only 500,000 people
live, there is a Moroccan army of 100,000 people. Britain sells armored
vehicles, sniper rifles, land-to-land missiles, missile launchers and howitzers
to Morocco for use in this region. In the past two years, it has delivered
light weapons worth more than $1 billion. Due to the competition between
Algeria and Morocco, Algeria also supports and supplies weapons to the separatist
movements in Western Sahara. Recently, Morocco has signed a new deal with the
US for 150 tanks.
The British
deep state certainly doesn't want peace in the region. Not only does the UN not
recognize the independence of Western Sahara, but it also doesn't recognize the
sovereignty of Morocco, over which the region has been embroiled in war for a
long time. As one would expect, this was a part of the British deep state plans
concocted 100 years ago to dismember the Ottoman Empire. The plan seems to work
without a problem.
Tunisia
In the
1850s, Tunisia was being ruled by Ottoman-appointed 'Beys'. However, it later
initiated a so-called 'modernization' movement, which was in truth an
imperialist policy of the British deep state in disguise, designed to paralyze
countries economically, socially and culturally. As a result, Tunisia paid huge
sums to Britain for her defense expenses and the rest followed, as it always
does whenever the British deep state is involved. Economically crippled, the
country became more dependent on Britain, borrowed more money and inevitably
bankrupted. Due to astronomical interest rates, the Tunisian government, which
had borrowed only 30 million Francs, had to pay it back after a short while
with interest in the amount of 70 million Francs. In fact, the Turkish people
are very familiar with this interest trap. It was among the reasons for the
collapse of the Empire, not to mention this trap was a project of the British
deep state. A similar method was being employed for Egypt almost
simultaneously, just as in India in the past.
After
receiving its first loan in 1863, the Tunisian government had to introduce new
taxes the following year. People, who were already very poor, couldn't endure
the pressure and rebelled in 1864. Although a government clampdown worked, new
debts brought new taxes, which caused new riots. This vicious cycle continued
until Tunisia became a French protectorate.
Tunisia,
already with poor agricultural production, was forced to export most of its
produce to pay back her debts, which caused famine and cholera. 10,000
Tunisians lost their lives as a result.
When the
state bankrupted, an institution similar to the Ottoman Public Debt
Administration was set up, and the Tunisian economy was entrusted to the British
and French. Ultimately, Tunisia was left to France in exchange for Cyprus,
seized without a military effort. This was neither the first nor the last deal
in which the British deep state was sharing the Ottoman lands.
Only 18
years after the first foreign debt was acquired, France, with its 36,000
troops, invaded Tunisia in 1881. When the Bey of Tunisia Muhammad III as-Sadiq
understood that he wouldn't be able to fight back, he signed a treaty that made
Tunisia a French protectorate.
From that
date until 1956, when they gained their independence under the leadership of
Habib Bourguiba, Tunisia was embroiled in constant conflicts, civil wars and
terror. Occupation by Nazis was followed by Allied victory. The French applied
strict measures to suppress Tunisian nationalism, and during this time, tens of
thousands of Muslims were martyred by the French.
In those
years, Britain had the sole say in the distribution of power in the world. No
country could invade a place unless permitted by Britain. As previously
explained, France was able to capture regions only in line with the plans of
the British deep state. This allowed Britain to control vast lands through its
allies and keep in check an important power like France.
Algeria
was another country that suffered from similar endeavors of the British deep
state.
For 300
years, Algeria was the principal center of Ottoman power in the Maghreb.
Governors appointed by the Ottoman Sultan ran the province until France invaded
it in 1827, using a petty argument with the French Consul as an excuse. When a
meeting between Algeria's governor Hussein Dey and the French Consul got
heated, the dey struck the Consul three times with his hand fan. French
immediately made this incident an excuse for invasion, after which Hussein Dey
was exiled.
Now a French colony, the educational system of the country was changed, local administrators were stripped of their powers and social order came to a breaking point. Rich lands of Muslims were taken from them and handed over to French colonialists. Algeria became the administration center of the French colonies in Africa. Throughout the years, Muslims of North Africa witnessed the horrible face of European imperialism as Muslims were martyred en masse. French rule brought nothing but death to Muslims of Algeria. 175,000 Algerians fought for France during WWI, but 40,000 of them never returned. During the Algerian War of Independence, 1,000,000 Muslims lost their lives, while 3,000,000 were imprisoned in camps.
However,
even after the declaration of independence, the violence in Algeria didn't end.
On the contrary, the country plunged into a bloody civil war at the end of the
20th century, and following a coup against the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) in
1991, 150,000 Muslims were martyred at the hands of other Muslims. The Armed
Islamic Group of Algeria (GIA), founded in 1993, began to martyr Algerians of
all backgrounds, including FIS-linked Muslims. The British deep state was once
again behind GIA, which had a London-based magazine named Al-Ansar,
intended to recruit Muslims that could be made guerillas. Britain allowed these
activities, lent its support at times, and sometimes helped prepare the setting
for such activities.
The Favorite Arms Market of the British
Deep State: Africa
With the
world's biggest natural gas reserves and its large fertile lands, Algeria is a
blessed country. However, due to the ongoing conflict, a major portion of its
revenues is spent on weapons. So much so, Algeria alone accounts for 30% of
Africa's arms import, followed by Morocco with 26%. Between 2011 and 2015,
Algeria bought 4 warships, 190 tanks, 42 helicopters, 14 aircrafts and 2
submarines. And Morocco seems to be the only intended target of this military
preparation.
In truth,
the British deep state is once again involved, carrying out sinister plans as
always, which usually target Muslims. As a result of these plots, Muslims are
brought to a position where they spend their valuable resources on fighting
each other. And once again, the only party that truly benefits from the
situation is Britain. The British deep state continues today its efforts to
exploit Africa, by using its resources and creating conflicts.
Egypt
The most
important reason leading to Egypt being transferred to British rule was the
foreign debt that Midhat Pasha endorsed during his first term as the grand
vizier. In the next 15 years, the economy collapsed and Britain invaded Egypt
exactly as planned by the British deep state.
Egypt used loans with heavy penalties to build the Suez Canal in 1869 with the French. Six years later, unable to pay the interest, it had to transfer its share in the Canal to the British. Three years later, auditors of the creditors, France and Britain, began to assume positions in the Egyptian government. In a matter of nine years, the British seized the control of Egypt and then physically invaded the country four years later.
The events
that led up to the invasion of Egypt weren't completely different from what we
saw in other Ottoman territories. Instigated by the British deep state,
anti-Christian riots began in Alexandria, during which British and French navy
ships were conveniently present in the harbor of Alexandria. The British used
the riots as an excuse to attack the city, and then proceeded to a full-scale
invasion of Egypt, and made it a de facto protectorate, which became official
in 1914. The British deep state then instigated a similar insurgency in Sudan,
which at the time was a part of Egypt. The Egyptian army under the command of
British General Herbert Kitchener suppressed the riot, which led Sudan to be
effectively administered as a British colony. Sudan remained so until 1956.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder